IQ, Climate, and other theories…

Today me and my father had quite a dinner conversation. We discussed different theories on why wealthiness and progress differ so much in the world depending on the region. Two theories are very interesting, but not entirely  politically correct. There is “climate theory” which explains the difference between north and south as natural due to environment. If you live in a place which is too hot you will become slow and indolent whereas if you live in a more tempered zone you’ll find that your body will work more properly and efficient. This would then be one explanation to why there are basic differences between Europe and Africa in the first place when it comes to social and economic progress. The other one is even more controversial. Race, Evolution and Behavior: A Life History Perspective is a book written by J. Philippe Rushton, a professor of psychology at the University of Western Ontario, and the current head of the Pioneer fund. Rushton claims that race is a valid biological concept and that it can explain many things when “race IQ” is being compared together with economic progress etc.

I have my own theory then of course and that is about economic freedom. Economic freedom allows for independent sources of wealth that serve both to counterbalance political power and to nourish a pluralistic society. For instance in Estonia or in other earlier-on oppressed countries, economic freedom has steadily increased, thus strengthening democracy, thus strengthening education for the people (improvement of IQ) and benefitting to the total amount of wealth for the country itself.

In 1962, Nobel laureate in economics Milton Friedman observed:

History speaks with a single voice on the relation between political freedom and a free market. I know of no example in time or place of a society that has been marked by a large measure of political freedom, and that has not also used something comparable to a free market to organize the bulk of economic activity.

The collapse of central planning in Third World countries and of socialism itself in the past 20 years seems to support Friedman’s thesis. The rise in economic freedom has accompanied that of political and civil freedom around the world, and both have been significant as countries have moved away from authoritarianism and opened their markets.


About tegis

This blog belongs to Carl-Mikael A. Teglund - tegis. Swedish emigrant with a heart for languages, philosophy, history, and politics (classical liberalism in the European tradition). Go ahead and look, read, or listen. I'm sure you will find it interesting.
This entry was posted in America, Scandinavia. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to IQ, Climate, and other theories…

  1. Bill says:

    Race does not have anything to do with progress or wealth. Resources are a primary need. If you lack the necessary resources you can not progress. As we advance in technology, resources become more important and the resources change as well – five hundred years ago oil was not an important resource as it is now.
    Free markets become imperative as technology increases. With socialism or any type of authoritarianism you retard advancement of humanity thus causing the collapse of what you mention.

  2. Amanda says:

    i was doing a google image search for freedom and came upon your website.. then i discovered this…

    “La libertad es el derecho”

    i was just wondering what it meant..

  3. tegis says:

    Hi, it is Spanish and it means “Freedom is the right thing … ” OR “Freedom is a legitimacy” 🙂

    I love Spanish =)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s